Bruce Bikes!

Bruce Bikes!

Bruce Bikes!

Detroit was built on four wheels, now it’s being reimagined on two.

Detroit was built on four wheels, now it’s being reimagined on two.

Detroit was built on four wheels, now it’s being reimagined on two.

About

About

Simulated Problem: Bruce Bikes website is outdated. They are pivoting their standard bicycle company to specialize in electric bikes and eco-friendly options for bicyclists. The company would like to update their logo and have a more responsive website to create a seamless experience for their customers to showcase this newly released electric bicycle. The company is based in Detroit, MI. They would like the design to feel bold, creative, and industrial.


Goal: Design Bruce Bikes logo and lay the foundation for their website that has an eye-catching design, clear hierarchy structure, and seamless user experience.

Timeline:

Timeline:

Role:

Role:

Lead UX Designer - Interaction Design, Visual Design, User Flows

Lead UX Designer - Interaction Design, Visual Design, User Flows

Tools:

Tools:

Figma, User Testing Interviews

Figma, User Testing Interviews

Figma, User Testing Interviews

June 2026 - September 2026

June 2026 - September 2026

Research & Discovery

Research & Discovery

Persona:

Persona:

Your ideal customer is a man named Leo. Leo is in their mid 40’s and lives with friends. Leo is a high school graduate and works on a small team. Leo lives in Detroit, is very familiar with your product, and is very Eco / Environment / Waste-conscious.

Ideation:

Through the ideation processs, we have uncovered that the design should express the culture of Detroit, while focusing on an eco-friendly persona. Key words include: Industrial, Electric, and Artistic - focusing on Graffiti. This is the guiding principle of the logo and design for the website. 

Ideation:

Persona:

Ideation:

Research & Discovery

Mindmap

Mindmap

Analytical Review:

Analytical Review:

  • Detroit is an up-and-coming, moderately bike-friendly city with a flat terrain, wide streets, and a growing network of dedicated greenways, though it remains car-centric with varying infrastructure quality.

  • Bike Lanes: Detroit features over 175 miles of bike facilities, including roughly 50 miles of protected lanes and 120+ miles of unprotected or sharrow lanes.

  • Major Trails: Key traffic-free paths include the Dequindre Cut (a 2-mile paved greenway connecting Eastern Market to the riverfront) and the Detroit Riverwalk, which stretches nearly 5 miles along the water.

  • Future Projects: The expanding Joe Louis Greenway aims to create a continuous 27.5-mile loop connecting Detroit to neighboring communities.

Resources:

Competitive Audit:

Detroit Electric Bike Company

https://www.detroitebikes.com/

What they offer
A single-brand e-bike manufacturer/retailer based in Troy, MI, founded 2020. Six named models (Cruiser, Rocket A, Rocket B, MJ Special, Scootsta, Demos), positioned around "American craftsmanship" and Detroit manufacturing heritage. They sell direct - showroom test rides, phone sales, and online shipping for orders over $2,000.

Flow & layout
Fairly conventional e-commerce structure: hero > product carousel > feature highlights ("Why Choose Us") > brand story > contact/showroom > footer nav. The path from homepage to a specific product is short (2 clicks). Phone number is persistent in header and footer, which fits a business that wants to convert by call or visit, not just cart checkout.

Heuristic Review

  • Recognition over recall: Six near-identical bike names (Rocket A vs Rocket B, MJ Special, Scootsta) with no visual differentiation cues on the homepage - a user has to click into each to understand what distinguishes them. Naming alone doesn't help decision-making.

  • Consistency: The product list (Cruiser, Rocket A/B, etc.) is repeated three separate times on the homepage (nav dropdown, carousel, "Our Collection" grid) - redundant rather than reinforcing, and inflates scroll length without adding new information.

  • Aesthetic and minimalist design: Testimonials section header appears with no actual testimonials rendered - an empty/broken module is a credibility risk on a page whose job is to build trust in a direct-to-consumer purchase.


DMW Electric (Detroit Moped Works)

https://dmwelectric.bike/

What they offer
A multi-brand reseller of e-bikes and electric mopeds (Monday Motorbikes, KBO, Himiway, Detroit Bikes, ONYX), operating out of what's described as North America's largest vintage moped shop, now expanding into e-bikes.

Flow & layout
This is the weakest of the three structurally. The homepage is a sequence of brand paragraphs with no clear product grid, pricing, filtering, or comparison mechanism. There's no evident path from "I'm interested in X type of bike" to a specific product page - a user has to already know which brand they want.

Heuristic Review

  • User control and freedom / navigation: No visible way to browse by bike type, price, or use case - the page structure (brand blurb after brand blurb) forces linear reading rather than letting a user jump to what's relevant to them.

  • Recognition over recall: Six brands are described in prose with no visual product thumbnails, specs, or prices alongside them - a user has to hold six brand identities in their head with almost no differentiating visual anchor.

  • Match between system and real world: The page reads like an "About our partners" page rather than a shopping page, even though the meta framing ("sells some of the most popular and affordable models") signals commerce intent. That mismatch between stated purpose and actual page function is a real usability gap.

  • Error prevention: With no comparison tool and no filtering, a user is likely to leave and comparison-shop elsewhere rather than risk picking the wrong brand blind - this is a conversion leak as much as a UX flaw.


Downtown Bike Shop (Ferndale)

https://www.downtown-bikeshop.com/

What they offer
A general independent bike shop, established 2010, with e-bikes as one category among general biking and repair services. Value proposition centers on service speed (24-48 hour repair turnaround), staff experience (60+ years combined), and brand variety in-stock.

Flow & layout
Heavily image/logo-driven homepage - largely a scroll of brand logos with minimal surrounding text or hierarchy. Navigation (Home, About, Tune Up, Bikes, E-Bikes, Hours/Location, Contact) is reasonably clear in structure, but the homepage itself doesn't guide a user toward any of those sections - it's mostly a static brand-logo wall.

Heuristic Review

  • Visibility of system status: There's no indication of what's actually in stock, current pricing, or availability - for a shop whose pitch is fast service and in-stock variety, the homepage doesn't surface any of that in real time.

  • Aesthetic and minimalist design: A long unbroken sequence of brand logo images with no captions or context dilutes the message - a user can't tell at a glance which brands matter most or why they're listed, and the sheer image count slows the page and the scroll.

  • Flexibility and efficiency of use: "HOURS & LOCATION" and "CONTACT" nav items both link to the same homepage URL rather than distinct sections/pages - this breaks the expectation that distinct nav labels lead to distinct content, and it's a small but real dead end for anyone specifically hunting for store hours.

  • Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors: The contact form's only feedback is "Thanks for submitting!" with no indication of response time or next steps (compare to Detroit Electric Bike Co., which explicitly states "we'll respond within 24hrs").

Analytical Review:

Competitive Audit:

Competitive Audit:

User Journey / Flowchart

User Journey / Flowchart

Lo-Fi Wireframes

Lo-Fi Wireframes

Lo-Fi Wireframes

Testing | Iteration | Results

Testing | Iteration | Results

Testing | Iteration | Results

Results:

The visual direction was about making Bruce Bikes feel industrial and electric, something with a little edge to it, pulling from graffiti-style type and a dark palette with that neon green cutting through. The typography ended up being the trickiest part honestly, it needed to look handwritten and a bit chaotic but still be readable at a glance, and I went through a few versions before landing on something that did both.

Layout-wise it's a responsive grid. Holds up on a laptop, holds up on a phone. I wanted navigating it to just not be a thing people think about.


The homepage is doing a couple things at once. There's an email sign-up to capture interest early, and there are three feature callouts, Weightless Ride, Long Lasting Battery, Safety Features, so a visitor gets a sense of what's different about these bikes without having to dig into product pages. That mattered to me because when I looked at the competitor sites earlier, none of them actually surfaced what made their bikes different until you clicked in pretty deep. I wanted that on the surface here.

Testing & Iteration:

I ran the prototype past five people, some who ride e-bikes already, some who never have, and just asked them to look at the homepage and tell me what they thought.


The visual identity got a strong reaction. One tester, who does graphic design for work, said "okay this actually looks like it's a brand, and like someone thought about it." Another kept coming back to the little traffic-light bike icon in the hero, she said something like "wait go back, I like that thing, what is that.” This stood out to me as an interesting touch and something to keep.


The feature callouts mostly worked. A couple people scrolled right to Long Lasting Battery without me saying anything, so the visual hierarchy seems to be pulling attention where it should. One guy who's shopped for e-bikes before said, kind of flatly, "yeah this is nice, I didn't have to hunt for the battery info, usually it's buried."

Not everything landed though. Two people flagged the email sign-up as showing up too soon, one just said "I hadn't looked at anything yet and it's already asking me stuff," and I don't have a clean answer for that yet. Delaying it until someone scrolls or making it a section in the footer are alternative options, but I haven't tested it yet.

Evaluation:

Future iterations and updates would include:


  • Expand the website to include account management, a features video, and additional product listings, moving it from a single-page pitch toward a fuller storefront experience

  • Analytics monitoring - instrument the live site to track conversion, return visits, and task completion, so future decisions are grounded in real behavior instead of assumptions

  • Follow-up usability testing - run a second round of testing on the shipped version to check whether specific fixes (like adjusting the email sign-up timing) actually solved what they were meant to solve

  • User feedback loops - build in ongoing channels for post-launch feedback through surveys, in-app prompts, and support tickets, so problems surface as patterns rather than one-off complaints

  • A/B testing - test variations of key decisions (like sign-up timing, or the two feature-callout copy directions) against real traffic, rather than relying on a single small test group's reaction

  • Accessibility audit - check the final palette and typography (especially the high-contrast neon-on-dark scheme) against WCAG contrast standards, since bold color choices made for visual impact can sometimes create readability issues for some users

Results:

Results:

The visual direction was about making Bruce Bikes feel industrial and electric, something with a little edge to it, pulling from graffiti-style type and a dark palette with that neon green cutting through. The typography ended up being the trickiest part honestly, it needed to look handwritten and a bit chaotic but still be readable at a glance, and I went through a few versions before landing on something that did both.

Layout-wise it's a responsive grid. Holds up on a laptop, holds up on a phone. I wanted navigating it to just not be a thing people think about.


The homepage is doing a couple things at once. There's an email sign-up to capture interest early, and there are three feature callouts, Weightless Ride, Long Lasting Battery, Safety Features, so a visitor gets a sense of what's different about these bikes without having to dig into product pages. That mattered to me because when I looked at the competitor sites earlier, none of them actually surfaced what made their bikes different until you clicked in pretty deep. I wanted that on the surface here.

User Journey / Flowchart

Testing & Iteration:

Testing & Iteration:

I ran the prototype past five people, some who ride e-bikes already, some who never have, and just asked them to look at the homepage and tell me what they thought.


The visual identity got a strong reaction. One tester, who does graphic design for work, said "okay this actually looks like it's a brand, and like someone thought about it." Another kept coming back to the little traffic-light bike icon in the hero, she said something like "wait go back, I like that thing, what is that.” This stood out to me as an interesting touch and something to keep.


The feature callouts mostly worked. A couple people scrolled right to Long Lasting Battery without me saying anything, so the visual hierarchy seems to be pulling attention where it should. One guy who's shopped for e-bikes before said, kind of flatly, "yeah this is nice, I didn't have to hunt for the battery info, usually it's buried."

Not everything landed though. Two people flagged the email sign-up as showing up too soon, one just said "I hadn't looked at anything yet and it's already asking me stuff," and I don't have a clean answer for that yet. Delaying it until someone scrolls or making it a section in the footer are alternative options, but I haven't tested it yet.

Evaluation:

Evaluation:

Future iterations and updates would include:


  • Expand the website to include account management, a features video, and additional product listings, moving it from a single-page pitch toward a fuller storefront experience

  • Analytics monitoring - instrument the live site to track conversion, return visits, and task completion, so future decisions are grounded in real behavior instead of assumptions

  • Follow-up usability testing - run a second round of testing on the shipped version to check whether specific fixes (like adjusting the email sign-up timing) actually solved what they were meant to solve

  • User feedback loops - build in ongoing channels for post-launch feedback through surveys, in-app prompts, and support tickets, so problems surface as patterns rather than one-off complaints

  • A/B testing - test variations of key decisions (like sign-up timing, or the two feature-callout copy directions) against real traffic, rather than relying on a single small test group's reaction

  • Accessibility audit - check the final palette and typography (especially the high-contrast neon-on-dark scheme) against WCAG contrast standards, since bold color choices made for visual impact can sometimes create readability issues for some users